IFW Logo
 
 

“To protect Idaho's hunting and fishing heritage. To fight against all legal and legislative attempts by the animal rights and anti-gun organizations who are attempting to take away our rights and freedoms under the constitution of the United States Of America. To hold all Government and State Agencies who are stewards of our Wildlife accountable and ensure that science is used as the primary role for our Wildlife management."

   

 

Idaho’s Lolo Wildlife Management Zones Devoid Of Elk

IDFG Director Cal Groen recently said "a study of elk mortality in the Lolo Zone show that 2 percent was from hunters taking elk, and 47 percent from wolves. “That concerns us, because we are trying to get a balance of populations that we can actively manage,” he said.

February 27, 2010

Recently the IDFG completed the aerial elk counts for the Lolo Wildlife Management Zones 10 and 12 in Idaho. Zone 10 counted 1,473 elk, while Zone 12 tallied 705. So how does this compare with previous years when aerial counts were done?

Zone 10:
1989 – 11,507
1992 – 7,745
1994 – 9,729
1998 – 5,079
2003 – 2,643
2006 – 3,452
2010 – 1,473

Zone 12:
1989 – 3,763
1992 – 3,452
1994 – 3,315
1995 – 3,832
1997 – 2,667
2002 – 2,048
2006 – 1,658
2010 – 705

Wolves were reintroduced in 1995. Any idiot can see there is an elk management problem……more like a wolf management problem.

What we hear perpetually from the wolf advocates and environmentalist is how the elk counts in Idaho show the number of elk growing or holding steady. What they refuse to tell you is that in those areas where the wolves are flourishing, we see numbers just as are shown above. When the wolves have eaten everything in sight in the Lolo Zone, they will move on to find more prey and destroy it as well. Only until they have completed that task will we see the “natural”management kick in where wolves will starve to death and/or die of disease and cannibalism.

Allowing wolves to grow in these numbers will ensure that they virtually wipe out elk herds and is not good wildlife management and contrary to what we all hear this is not the kind of Utopian “natural” wildlife management any of us should aspire for. It’s irresponsible.

We must encourage the Idaho Fish and Game to begin using the Federal 10J Rule to reduce wolf numbers before it is to late!

 

 

Lolo Zone - Units 10, 12 - Elk Harvested
Elk Harvested     Graph
Year Unit 10 Unit 12 Total
1989 1559 416 1975
1990 1490 274 1764
1991 952 476 1428
1992 1104 543 1647
1993 625 230 855
1994 915 576 1491
1995 773 473 1246
1996 773 473 1246
1997 354 138 492
1998 165 106 271
1999 105 105 210
2000 119 110 229
2001 96 75 171
2002 103 81 184
2003 176 100 276
2004 187 158 345
2005 174 130 304
2006 206 134 340
2007 183 108 291
2008 153 68 221
Elk Harvested (%)  
Year Unit 10 Unit 12
1989 100.0% 100.0%
1990 95.6% 65.9%
1991 61.1% 114.4%
1992 70.8% 130.5%
1993 40.1% 55.3%
1994 58.7% 138.5%
1995 49.6% 113.7%
1996 49.6% 113.7%
1997 22.7% 33.2%
1998 10.6% 25.5%
1999 6.7% 25.2%
2000 7.6% 26.4%
2001 6.2% 18.0%
2002 6.6% 19.5%
2003 11.3% 24.0%
2004 12.0% 38.0%
2005 11.2% 31.3%
2006 13.2% 32.2%
2007 11.7% 26.0%
2008 9.8% 16.3%

Lolo Zone Elk harvest data 19989-2008